Minnesota Bids > Bid Detail

VCRC 5th Floor Add Hepa Units EM Power Tie-In - Sign-in Sheet-2

Agency: University of Minnesota
Level of Government: State & Local
Category:
  • Y - Construction of Structures and Facilities
Opps ID: NBD16744088036954963
Posted Date: Oct 26, 2022
Due Date: Nov 2, 2022
Solicitation No: 01-069-22-1760

Bid Information



Type
Request for Proposal
Status
Issued
Number
01-069-22-1760 Addendum 4 (VCRC 5th Floor Add Hepa Units EM Power Tie-In)
Issue Date & Time
9/19/2022 01:27:11 PM (CT)
Close Date & Time
11/2/2022 02:00:00 PM (CT)
Time Left 6 days 18 hours 51 minutes 23 seconds
Notes
Design Services for the 5 th floor of the Variety Club Research Center, located on the east bank of the Twin Cities campus . Refer to the Request for Proposal documents (found in the Attachments tab) for full project details/requirements.


Before submitting questions about the RFP via the Questions Tab, read and review the RFX INSTRUCTIONS, REQUIREMENTS, AND RIGHTS RESERVED BY THE UNIVERSITY DOCUMENT and ALL Attributes in the Attributes Tab. These provide valuable information and address frequently asked questions.


Contact Information
Name
Kevin Sullivan
Address
1300 S. 2nd Street
Minneapolis, MN 55454
Phone
Fax
Email
sull0198@umn.edu





Bid Attachments












File Name Description File Size

RFP - VCRC Hepa.docx
Request for Proposal 305 KB

RFx Instructions and Requirements - V9.pdf
RFx Instructions, Requirements, and Rights Reserved by the University 216 KB

2022-08-12_VCRC 5th Flr PREDESIGN REPORT.pdf
Predesign Report 4.89 MB

Sign-in Sheet.jpg
Addendum # 1: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-in Sheet 775 KB

Addendum2.pdf
Addendum # 2: RFP Clarification 60 KB

Addendum3.zip
Addendum # 3: Additional RFP Clarifications 683 KB

Sign-in Sheet-2.jpg
Addendum # 4: Second Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-in Sheet 119 KB



Bid Questions













Question
Does the University have an intended construction delivery method in mind for this project (CMaR, Design-Bid-Build, etc.)? If CMaR is the intended delivery method, at what design phase should the GMP documents be expected?
Answer The delivery method will be CMaR. Two GMP's are anticipated; 1) Early procurement of long lead item equipment based on a separate bid specification completed as soon as possible and 2) the balance of the project at DD Phase.
Submitted 10/5/2022 11:37:15 AM (CT)


Question
The RFP identifies the need for BOR approval for this project. However, this typically occurs at an early phase of the project (as identified in Attachment D, 1.c). Section 1.5 identifies the completion of construction documents be no later than 1/31/23. Is it the University's intent to have BOR approval take place at an earlier date, and as a result then stipulates a deliverable of an earlier design phase?
Answer With the issuance of Addendum #3 adding a brief update of the Predesign Report, the University hopes to go to the Board of Regents in December. Once approved, we'll proceed immediately into design. The 1/31/23 date is no longer valid. Proposers should schedule forward from the December approval date. Rather than a University dictated completion date, the greater priority is the early bid package and overall GMP date based on DD package. These two dates will drive completion schedule. Build your schedule accordingly.
Submitted 10/5/2022 11:31:57 AM (CT)


Question
The RFP Document does not address structural engineering scope of work. It is the University’s intention for these design teams to provide predesign services for the necessary structural evaluation to accurately identify potential structural scope associated with this project? If so, will the University modify Attachment E, Table 1 of the RFP to designate this additional service?
Answer The required structural engineering should be included as a Basic Service.
Submitted 10/5/2022 11:21:49 AM (CT)


Question
The requirements of the RFP and the predesign report include a new rooftop generator for standby power as an alternate scope. Can the university confirm that the expected scope of this project is to provide a new rooftop standby generator to address the program associated with this project, and not to further investigate the feasibility, evaluation, or reconfiguration of the existing generator for RAR’s needs?
Answer Correct. The results of a metering study indicated that the existing generator is not sufficient. A new generator is included in the scope of this project.
Submitted 10/5/2022 11:11:36 AM (CT)


Question
Cost estimating is referenced within the RFP and was briefly mentioned during the site walk through, but specifics associated with this scope is not clearly defined. Can the University clarify at which point in the design phase or phases that cost estimating should occur if it is required at all?
Answer Cost estimating is not required.
Submitted 10/4/2022 04:59:21 PM (CT)


Question
Can the existing ductwork drawings be made available to potential bidders to allow them to understand the design scope that may be necessary to execute the desired building systems changes associated with the scope of this project (combining several systems into one)?
Answer Per Addendum #3, this question is no longer relevant.
Submitted 9/29/2022 10:35:37 AM (CT)


Question
It was mentioned in the pre-bid walkthrough that the University could be interested in combining schematic design (SD) and design development (DD) phases. Can this be clarified, and how or will Attachment E be modified to reflect this?
Answer The University recommends a combined SD/DD phase. Attachment E will not be changed. Proposers can leave the SD line blank and insert combined phase fee in DD phase line if they agree with a combined phase. The bid package for early procurement of equipment still applies.
Submitted 9/29/2022 10:33:48 AM (CT)







TRY FOR FREE

Not a USAOPPS Member Yet?

Get unlimited access to thousands of active local, state and federal government bids and awards in All 50 States.

Start Free Trial Today >